<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Search Mobile Has Been Updated To Bing Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/</link>
	<description>Your Tech World in High Definition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather May</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am                  using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am                  using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowman</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree with you here.  BING is definitely good but has some work to do to get up there with Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree with you here.  BING is definitely good but has some work to do to get up there with Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>i am a user of Microsofts BING              search engine and it is as good as google for static webpage search. for searching blogs, i think google gives more relevant search results compared bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a user of Microsofts BING              search engine and it is as good as google for static webpage search. for searching blogs, i think google gives more relevant search results compared bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowman</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>I agree with you here. Google right now has been out longer and should pull up more relevant searches for now but Bing should be making its way to meet them soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you here. Google right now has been out longer and should pull up more relevant searches for now but Bing should be making its way to meet them soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen Cruz</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>BING search engine is just as good as Google. In my own personal experience, Google does give more releveant search result than Bing but the difference is very small.                   **</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BING search engine is just as good as Google. In my own personal experience, Google does give more releveant search result than Bing but the difference is very small.                   **</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowman</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Yes right now Google is giving out a bit better results and they are more realivate but i&#039;ve been using Bing as a default for awhile and its gotten a lot of stuff for me.  I have a video come up on this on my youtube channel.  Check the links on the site for the channel link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes right now Google is giving out a bit better results and they are more realivate but i&#8217;ve been using Bing as a default for awhile and its gotten a lot of stuff for me.  I have a video come up on this on my youtube channel.  Check the links on the site for the channel link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Vega</title>
		<link>http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwone.com/live-search-mobile-has-been-updated-to-bing-mobile/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>i   am   using  both   Bing    and   Google   and i think  both search   engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i   am   using  both   Bing    and   Google   and i think  both search   engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/20 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 573/573 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via media.bwone.com

Served from: bwone.com @ 2012-05-24 03:30:01 -->
